|
|
Back Related Items: Binding: Audio CD EAN: 0744861079323 Label: Matador Records Manufacturer: Matador Records Number Of Discs: 2 Publisher: Matador Records Release Date: 2008-01-22 Studio: Matador Records Rating: - Another Great Idea of Chan'sI would consider myself a "big fan" of Cat Power's. I enjoy her music. She has the ability to create music originally and a more impressive ability to re-create music originally. Her album, "The Covers Record" is the first showing of this talent. She takes songs that you know and love and she turns them into something completely new and exciting. She did a great job with that album and an equally great job with this one. I recommend that you buy both albums as well as her original works. Rating: - Music CDSaw Cat Power in concert where she warmed up for Gnarls Barkley - she was awesome in person, but I don't like most of this CD. Rating: - Such A DelightI can honestly admit that Chan Marshall has one of those voices that you can listen to all day regardless of the style or subject matter of the music at hand. She could do a cover album of all Wesley Willis and it would still be solid, so on her new and second album of covers, Jukebox, Marshall reinterprets songs from great vocalists that have influenced her over the years. The list of artists that she tackles is impressive and includes Frank Sinatra, James Brown, Joni Mitchell, Janis Joplin, Hank Williams and even herself on "Metal Heart" from the Moon Pix (1998) album. All of the songs are a great listen because Chan Marshall has the talent and vocal strength of anyone out there. This is a ... Read More Rating: - Enjoyable, but not always interesting.Chan Marshall is able to create great texture with her voice and make these covers her own. The CD is a great concept piece, but the songs lack the unique touches that make them distinguishible from each other. Rating: - FABGreat CD, great mood music, reminds me of Mazzy Star only better, the artist shows great courage to cover these songs and she owns them. What makes her really really special is the band. It's a great marriage. |
Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."
I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.
I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.
I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.
I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.
Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.
There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.
Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants.
In a dusty supply closet at 1 Times Square, a computer terminal hooked up to hordes of ethernet servers, RAID arrays and monitors humbly runs the largest LED sign in the world. The sign, a 3-sided, 17,000-square-foot Goliath, debuted last night at the opening of a Walgreens in New York City. Today, I got to see what makes it tick.
Each side of the sign, designed by D3 LED, requires a 48-drive RAID pumping data at a rate of 3.2GB/second to a custom-built PC. From there, the data is fed through graphics cards to multiple DVI pipes, which lead to six DVI pixel splitters (known as a Spyders). The splitters take video data of a specific resolution and upscale it to the size needed for the display. Once the data is crunched and formatted for the sign, it's sent out via 4Gbps ethernet to one of more than 12,000 display modules that make up the ginormous billboard.
Each module is a mini-computer, complete with MAC address, redundant 4-gigabit ethernet ports, power supply and a fan. Each panel can report all kinds of vital statistics, including its temperature. If there's a problem, the panel reports itself to the main computer for easy troubleshooting. (Like a good communist, it can report problems with its neighbors, too.) The majority of the electronics are accessible from inside, so dangerous repair jobs on scaffolding suspended over Times Square are a thing of the past.
The sign's modules are split into three sections, low-, medium- and high-resolution grids based on their distance from the street. (Why waste pixels for objects way high up?) The top, as you probably guessed, has the largest pixels, at 24mm, while the middle has 12mm and the bottom has 10mm.
The animators are faced with a tough challenge when creating content for the signs, as they must keep the different display sizes in mind so the animation appears cohesive throughout the sections. To help out the animators, sign creator D3 LED made a virtual copy of it that is 10,000 pixels high by 4,000 pixels wide, the equivalent of 43 megapixels. (It's 20 times the resolution of HD, too.) They use an Adobe After Effects template to help coordinate placement of the animations on the slash-shaped sign.
As previously reported, a single 30-second spot on the billboard requires a staggering 150GB of data transferred through the system. But before you accuse D3 and Walgreens of hogging all of the power in New York, they attest that they are not. With the Con Ed bill in mind, their design reduced unnecessary copper wiring by over 300,000 feet and increased the voltage for more efficient power. They also set up an auto-dimmer (like you might have on your laptop) that adjusts the luminosity of the LEDs based on the ambient light outside. All of this makes it not necessarily cheap but at least cheaper than you'd think to operate.
The Walgreens sign is a complex, fascinating testament to the sheer power of LED displays. While most people living in New York avoid Times Square exactly because of things like this, tourists will undoubtedly flock to the center to observe the sign up close, even though it can be seen from as far away as Bryant Park and the Port Authority. For now, it's something that even this semi-jaded NYC resident can appreciate. [Walgreens Sign on Giz]